Health Care Acquired Infections
Summary
Some reports estimate that nearly $45 billion dollars are spent yearly on health care-associated infections. The CDC estimates that 1.7 million infections cause 99,000 deaths in hospitals each year. However, hospitals are making incredible strides to reduce, and in some cases eliminate, HAIs. The following is a list of resources and case study examples highlighting hospitals as they strive to provide quality health care.
Health care acquired infections (HAIs), also known as nosocomial infections, are infections that patients acquire while receiving treatment for medical or surgical conditions. HAIs occur in all settings of care, including hospitals, surgical centers, ambulatory clinics, and long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes and rehabilitation facilities. All hospitalized patients are susceptible to contracting a nosocomial infection. Some patients are at greater risk than others—young children, the elderly, and persons with compromised immune systems are more likely to get an infection. Other risk factors are long hospital stays, the use of indwelling catheters, failure of health care workers to wash their hands, and overuse of antibiotics, according to Healthline.
In American hospitals alone, the CDC estimates that health care-associated infections account for an estimated 1.7 million infections and 99,000 associated deaths each year. Of these infections:
-
32 percent of all healthcare-associated infection are urinary tract infections
-
22 percent are surgical site infections
-
15 percent are pneumonia (lung infections)
Patients who acquire infections from surgery spend, on average, an additional 6.5 days in the hospital, are five times more likely to be readmitted after discharge and twice as likely to die. Moreover, surgical patients who develop infections are 60 percent more likely to require admission to a hospital’s intensive care unit. Surgical infections are believed to account for up to ten billion dollars annually in health care expenditures. [ii]
-
health care providers cleaning their hands with soap and water or an alcohol-based hand rub before and after caring for every patient;
-
catheters being used only when necessary and removed as soon as possible;
-
cleaning the skin where the catheter is being inserted or the surgical site, and;
-
providers wearing hair covers, masks, gowns and gloves when appropriate. [iii]
To ensure health care providers are adhering to the guidelines, monitoring of performance is critical for determining the effectiveness of quality improvement interventions. Performance can be evaluated through outcome measures (for example, rate of occurrence of MRSA per 1,000 patient days) or process measures (for example, percent of patient encounters in compliance with hand hygiene procedure).
There is a movement towards mandating public reporting of hospital infection rates as an incentive for healthcare facilities to improve care and enable consumers to choose safer care. Twenty-six states now require public reporting of hospital infection rates. [iv]
Linkages to IOM Six Aims
Safe—Adopting infection control interventions will save patient lives
Effective—Hospitals adopting infection control interventions have seen significant decreases in HAI rates
Efficient—Time and money can be saved if guidelines are HAIs guidelines are implemented
Business Case
The economic costs for HAIs are considerable. The increased length of stay for infected patients is the greatest contributor to cost. HAIs cause an excess length of stay of 7.5 million days. [v] Prolonged hospital stays not only increase direct costs to patients and payers but also indirect costs due to lost work. The increased use of drugs, the need for isolation, and the use of additional lab and other diagnostic studies also contribute to costs. The overall direct medical costs of HAIs to hospitals ranges from $28.4 to $45 billion. The benefits of prevention range from $5.7 to $31.5 billion. [vi]
Beginning Oct. 1, 2008, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) no longer reimburses over and above the typical Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) rate for care required as a result of several types of health care-associated infection. CMS collaborated with other health care groups to identify a number of hospital-acquired conditions that were high volume, high cost or both and “could reasonably have been prevented through the application of evidence-based guidelines,” as mandated by Section 5001(c) of the Deficit Reduction Act.
The final rule states, hospitals “will not receive additional payment for cases in which one of the selected conditions was not present on admission." Among these selected conditions are catheter-associated urinary tract infection and surgical site infection — mediastinitis after coronary artery bypass graft.
Many health insurance companies are following suite and will no longer reimburse for these conditions. Some insurers have even decided to work collaboratively with hospitals to help reduce the incidence of HAIs, using tools such as electronic infection-monitoring systems.
Health Care Reform/Regulatory/Policy Considerations
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 was signed into law on February 17, 2009. It is designed to stimulate economic recovery, including strengthening the nation’s health care infrastructure and reducing health care costs. Within the Act, $50 million was authorized to support states in the prevention and reduction of HAIs. The HAI funds will be invested in efforts that support surveillance and research, improve quality of patient care, encourage collaboration, train the workforce in HAI prevention and measure outcomes. Many of these funds will be used to support activities outlined in the Department of Health and Human Services’ Action Plan to Prevent Health Care Associated-Infections.
On June 1, 2009, the AHA committed to furthering the use of best practices in infection prevention as part of the Administration’s cost containment goals.
Linkages to Performance Excellence
Reducing Process Variation—Hospitals that have implemented standardized protocols have seen reduction in HAIs
The Patient Experience—Targeting HAIs improves the quality of patient care
Resources & Tools for Health Care Acquired Infections
[i] The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of PreventionR. Douglas Scott II, division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Preparedness, Detection and Control of Infectious Diseases ,Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention March 2009
(accessed on June 9, 2009)
[ii] Cutting Surgical Infections Hospitals Making Progress, but too many patients fail to get the right care
(accessed on June 13, 2009)
[iii] D Classen and D. Yokoe. “Improving Patient Safety Through Infection Control: A New Healthcare Imperative. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2008; 29:S3-S11
[iv] Summary of State Laws on Hospital-Acquired Infections, May 15 2009
(accessed June 9, 2009)
[v] Graves N. Economics and preventing hospital-acquired infection. Emerg Infect Dis [serial online] 2004 Apr
(accessed on June 25, 2009)
[vi] The Direct Medical Costs of Healthcare-Associated Infections in U.S. Hospitals and the Benefits of Prevention
R. Douglas Scott II, division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Preparedness, Detection and Control of Infectious Diseases ,Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention March 2009
(accessed on June 9, 2009)


