Health Information Technology

Summary

Technology as a tool. HIT can prove vital in linking delivery sites, patient and providers with the information they need in a timely and efficient manner. It can streamline process and improve quality of patient care when effectively implemented. According to the 2009 H&HN's Most Wired Survey, while technology alone doesn't lead to performance improvement, the top tech performing hospitals have better quality indicators in mortality rates, AHRQ measure, Hospital Compare data and length of stay.

Health care organizations are focusing on increasing quality and clinical efficiency, and delivering services in an organized, efficient and cost-effective manner. However, because of the highly fragmented nature of health care delivery, patient information is stored in various locations, mainly on paper, and therefore cannot be easily accessed. As a result, health care providers do not have comprehensive information about the patient at the time where and place where care is being delivered.

HIT is one key to linking delivery sites, patients and providers with the information they need at the moment they need it. Additionally, HIT should be viewed as a tool for health care providers to streamline processes and improve quality of patient care.

Unfortunately, HIT is expensive to purchase, involves training, requires regular maintenance and upgrades and a communication/marketing plan to engage employees. These barriers might explain why only 11 percent of hospitals report having a fully implemented electronic medical record, while 57 percent have “partially” implemented systems and 32 percent have not started on a system. [i]   

Another barrier to implementation is that too often, bad processes are automated. Prior to implementation, workflow streams need to be evaluated and redesigned. That is why successful organizations align their HIT strategy with overall organizational objectives. HIT implementation is never the end goal. Rather it should be viewed as a tool to help achieve a larger, more global objective. For example, organizations don’t set out to have medication bar coding as its goal. Instead, after reviewing the entire medication administration process and identifying its weakness, the places where errors are most likely to occur, the process is re-engineered to eliminate potential errors. Tasks can be identified as benefiting the most from technology, either through automation to prevent human error or as a reference device to verify information.

Linkages to IOM Six Aims

Patient Centered —provides meaningful, understandable and useful information for patients and providers at the point of care. An aid in coordinating care between different providers.

Efficient —more complete, timely and relevant patient-focused data and clinical decision support tools available in a secure manner to both clinicians and patients as part of the workflow at the point of care.

Safe —provides comprehensive patient information in a centralized manner.

Business Case

HIT will significantly reduce health care costs by improving communication and efficiencies. The Commonwealth Fund report, Bending the Curve , put the aggregate system-wide savings of promoting health information technology at $88 billion over 10 years. In this report, it is estimated that the cost reductions would result from a lower rate of medical errors, more efficient use of diagnostic testing, more effective drug utilization, and decreased provider costs, among other improvements. In addition, savings would likely be achieved from better care coordination among multiple providers—and improved chronic care management—that would lead to a decrease in provider utilization and better health outcomes. Financial benefits accrue to all payers, with investments in HIT estimated to result in substantial cumulative net savings to all levels of government and households over 10 years and cumulative savings to private insurers after 11 years. [ii]

Furthermore, personal health records (PHRs), which let individuals maintain their own information in a portable platform, will also give patients a greater stake in their own care. In a recent study published in Health Affairs examining the Kaiser Permanente HIT system, researchers demonstrated patients' willingness to manage their health care online. Web site activity among Kaiser patients between 2004 and 2007 showed that there is a real potential for better results by getting patients more involved in their own health care through EHRs and PHRs. In 2004, 10.7 million people visited the site. By 2007, site visits had tripled to 33 million. [iii]

More actively involved patients, coupled with better-informed doctors communicating with one another, can reduce the number of expensive office visits. According to another study of the Kaiser system, Kaiser Permanente Hawaii saw a 26.2 percent decrease in office visits in the three years after implementing a comprehensive HIT system. Patients became far more likely to rely on cheaper and faster e-mail and phone consultations, facilitated by the fact that their doctors had electronic access to all of the patient information. Applied broadly, this kind of change could generate enormous cost savings in a $413 billion program like Medicare, which has over 40 million enrollees. [iv]

Health Care Reform/Regulatory/Policy Considerations

Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act or HITECH Act
Lawmakers incorporated the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (H.R. 1), the economic stimulus bill that the President signed into law on February 17, 2009 (P.L. 111-5). The HITECH Act is intended to promote the widespread adoption of health information technology (HIT) to support the electronic sharing of clinical data among hospitals, physicians, and other health care stakeholders.

This bill establishes four major goals that advance the use of health information technology (Health IT), such as electronic health records by:

  • Requiring the government to take a leadership role to develop standards by 2010 that allow for the nationwide electronic exchange and use of health information to improve quality and coordination of care.
  • Investing $20 billion in health information technology infrastructure and Medicare and Medicaid incentives to encourage doctors and hospitals to use HIT to electronically exchange patients’ health information.
  • Saving the government $10 billion, and generating additional savings throughout the health sector, through improvements in quality of care and care coordination, and reductions in medical errors and duplicative care.   
  • Strengthening Federal privacy and security law to protect identifiable health information from misuse as the health care sector increases use of Health IT.

As a result of this legislation, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that approximately 90 percent of doctors and 70 percent of hospitals will be using comprehensive electronic health records within the next decade. [v] 

Linkages to Performance Excellence

Perfect the patient experience—having relevant information at the point of care will increase quality of care patient receive

Remove waste—Streamlining processes will eliminate unnecessary steps

Reduce process variation—HIT promotes consistency and error reduction by automating processes.

Case Studies

More Case Studies

Resources & Tools for Health Information Technology

[i] Continued Progress: Hospital Use of Information Technology. American Hospital Association. 2007
(accessed July 1, 2009)

[ii] Bending the Curve: Options for Achieving Savings and Improving Value in U.S. Health Spending
Shcoen, Cahty MS, December 18, 2007
(accessed June 16, 2009)

[iii] Anna-Lisa Silvestre, Valerie M. Sue, and Jill Y. Allen, "If You Build It, Will They Come? The Kaiser Permanente Model of Online Health Care," Health Affairs, Vol. 28, No. 2 (March/April 2009), pp. 334-344.
(accessed June 3, 2009)

[iv] Catherine Chen, Terhilda Garrido, Don Chock, Grant Okawa, and Louise Liang, "The Kaiser Permanente Electronic Health Record: Transforming And Streamlining Modalities of Care," Health Affairs, Vol. 28, No. 2 (March/April 2009), pp. 323-333.
(accessed June 9, 2009)

[v]Title IV - Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act Prepared by the Majority Staff of the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means, and Science and Technology, January 16, 2009.
(accessed on July 1, 2009)